Yup, I was right

Posted by Kromey at 9:18pm Oct 6 '10
You must sign in to send Kromey a message
Just found a follow-up article on this incident (link below). As I had surmised from the limited information in the first, there is no tax-funded fire department to cover the area where this home burned. Instead, the city fire department (funded presumably by city, not county, taxes) offers the option for nearby county residents to pay a very reasonable fee to have them respond to fires well outside their standard jurisdiction.

To reiterate: It's a city fire department. These are county, not city, residents. The county does not provide fire protection services. The city has stepped up and offered to fill in that gap.

But obviously they cannot do that for free, and the county residents are not funding any fire department with their taxes.

Basically, the county and state governments have failed utterly, and the city government is picking up the slack; think of the "fee" as really a city tax that these non-city residents are voluntarily paying.


And to be clear, despite the obvious slant and spin in the first article posted, these fire departments are not "pay-to-spray": They are your usual tax-funded fire departments who in addition offer a subscription service to go outside their coverage area to protect your property from fire.
There are 60 private posts in this thread. You need to sign in to read them.

Below are the public posts you may view:

You currently have read-only access to this board. You must request an account to join the conversation.

Why Join 4thKingdom?

Note that there are no ads here. Just intelligent and friendly conversation. We keep the spam out, the trolls out, the advertisers out… 4K is just a low-key, old-fashioned site with members from around the world.
This community began in 1998, and we continue to accept new members today.

Hot Discussion Topics: