Sad news

Posted by Bob Janova at 7:36am Jun 29 '10
You must sign in to send Bob Janova a message
Expect more people to die. The people who are going to take advantage of this – people in modern cities who want a lethal weapon – are exactly the people who shouldn't have them.

Whether it's technically correct or not, it's fairly stupid that local government isn't allowed to set appropriate rules for their own area in this part of law.

The thing I don't understand about this is why pro-gun people think that 'arms' means 'handguns', which weren't even invented when that amendment was written. As far as I'm aware no-one's pushing your constitutional rights to carry anti-tank mortars, explosives and other types of 'arms' which are restricted. That's not even going down the road of how different the US is now to when an armed populace was a good idea.
There are 144 private posts in this thread. You need to sign in to read them.

Below are the public posts you may view:

You currently have read-only access to this board. You must request an account to join the conversation.

Why Join 4thKingdom?

Note that there are no ads here. Just intelligent and friendly conversation. We keep the spam out, the trolls out, the advertisers out… 4K is just a low-key, old-fashioned site with members from around the world.
This community began in 1998, and we continue to accept new members today.

Hot Discussion Topics: