Posted by Terminus at 2:31pm Oct 29 '07
You must sign in to send Terminus a message
You must sign in to send Terminus a message
The way the repeatedly say that she attacked Ms. Rice, and never once mentioned that she didn't touch her. It makes it sound as if she was attempting to physically assault her. While I understand removing HER from the situation (even with arrest, if need be) for security reasons, why did they arrest the others? What happened to their right to protest? Doesn't seem as if they did anything which warranted arrest (and if you say "disturbing the peace", well.. you could say that ANYBODY protesting anything was disturbing the peace, but we do have a right to do so.. where does the line get drawn these days? Seems like you only have the right to protest if nobody cares if you're there--which is rather useless, IMHO).