Posted by Kazper at 12:09pm Jul 27 '08One who is so sure that you're an idiot doesn't need to seek hard for proof for everything you do or don't do confirms it.
A problem with expressing yourself is that you can very easily be misunderstood when you don't effectively get across all the subtleties.
I think work life would be alot more tolerable if I had even one good friend. This friend wouldn't even have to work with with me. I think it's because then I would at least have a purpose besides survival. Like: *Alright, if I push on I'll make some money so me and my pal can get drunk or whatever.*
To writes it how you sez it may be ungrammatical but if the purpose is so that the reader sez it how you sez it then it should be understandable.
A prescriptionist grammar is a good idea because it can better assure clear communication among all members who share a language but a prescriptionist dialect is not superior to other dialects nor are the members who use it solely.
"They is" and "yous" and [like expressions] may not be prescriptionist grammatical english (and this is fine) but it's hardly dumb. In my own language I don't have... verb agreement, I only have one general plural word (an unbound morpheme that is usually suffixed) and probably a good amount of other things that a prescriptionist english grammarian who is a pedant would jump all over. (They is = solsq tx (third-person-plural equal) and Yous = milsq (second-person-plural)
In time of greater emotions one can reveal themself or one can forget themself.
One who is ignorant in a moment may be revealing the self that they are and desire and pretend not to be xor they may be revealing the self that they are and desire not and try not to be.
There's definitely times when I'm being a "suck" but alot of times when I'm wearing a frown it's because I feel the need to keep up my guard and be aloof.
~Shawn Savoie~
~Ottawa, Ontario, Canada~
A problem with expressing yourself is that you can very easily be misunderstood when you don't effectively get across all the subtleties.
I think work life would be alot more tolerable if I had even one good friend. This friend wouldn't even have to work with with me. I think it's because then I would at least have a purpose besides survival. Like: *Alright, if I push on I'll make some money so me and my pal can get drunk or whatever.*
To writes it how you sez it may be ungrammatical but if the purpose is so that the reader sez it how you sez it then it should be understandable.
A prescriptionist grammar is a good idea because it can better assure clear communication among all members who share a language but a prescriptionist dialect is not superior to other dialects nor are the members who use it solely.
"They is" and "yous" and [like expressions] may not be prescriptionist grammatical english (and this is fine) but it's hardly dumb. In my own language I don't have... verb agreement, I only have one general plural word (an unbound morpheme that is usually suffixed) and probably a good amount of other things that a prescriptionist english grammarian who is a pedant would jump all over. (They is = solsq tx (third-person-plural equal) and Yous = milsq (second-person-plural)
In time of greater emotions one can reveal themself or one can forget themself.
One who is ignorant in a moment may be revealing the self that they are and desire and pretend not to be xor they may be revealing the self that they are and desire not and try not to be.
There's definitely times when I'm being a "suck" but alot of times when I'm wearing a frown it's because I feel the need to keep up my guard and be aloof.
~Shawn Savoie~
~Ottawa, Ontario, Canada~