Posted by Kazper at 5:35pm Jan 5 '08A... [compressed script] (I don't think it's correct to call it shorthand since I think that it would take just as long or longer to use as a "normal script") idea I had was to have 5 millimeter squares (a type of graph paper I guess) that a dot of colour would be placed in. There would be different colours for the different graphemes. I think alot of information could fit on a page. It would be hard to use by hand but on a computer it would be easier.
The simplest braille type script to create, I would think, would be to just [embosse] a particular language's existing graphemes. Like I think the simplest type of sign language is to draw in the air or on the receiver a particular language's existing graphemes.
If I gotta work then I gotta work. If I don't gotta work... I ain't gonna. If one thinks that this is bad and that I'm lazy and that I should just suck it up and do it (WHEN I DON'T HAVE TO) then I don't care what one thinks.
If x1's in time of past and in time of beginning of,... xor ending of [event] then the event must also be in the past. If we conceive of front time of beginning of and behind time of ending of [event] as... mere [milliseconds] front and behind then x1's time is also the time of the event. If you don't have this conception (rule) then I think you'd run into the same problem I ran into. An example being: "x1 in time pf present and behind time of ending of [event]". I was like... if I'm in the present then the event has to be in the past. Technically it still is, I think, so my front and behind are right, right, right front and behind. Another good thing about this is that when the time of the event has been identified if the reality is that everything in the event is the same tense you do not have to convery those tenses. It's a brevity scheme! (As you can read, I'm excited. I thought I was screwed there for a little while).
I think the [to bes] (am, are, is, was, were, will be) are tense indicators (an aspect indicator as well) only sometimes and as well an equal at other times.
Example of the former: Shawn is hungry = Shawn [in time of present and in time of middle of] (Shawn desire equal (Shawn eat)).
Example of the latter: The door is closed = The door [in time of present and in time of middle of] (the door equal close[direct object of host word]) (I have to work on the definition of this suffix more but it should suffice for now.)
Nelly Furtado makes me hot, oh (::shrugs:: lol.) but sadly I don't mean anything to her :( (Don't those bangs make you wanna bang? :D)
Here's what a vocative might be: FA = [I YS ( AB desire equal (I attention of x1))] ("YS" equals "in time of present and in time of middle of". "AB" equal roughly "possesser of the tense and aspect word". It's a pronoun because the possesser of the tense and aspect word could be very long, perhaps multiple subject heads with long tails.)
When learning a second language you must take a descriptionist type approach and just learn how it works and use it how it's used.
Adjectives and adverbs may be a brevity scheme. The adjective/adverb may be a word at the end of a phrase that narrows down another word. If you take the end word and inflect it to indicate that it's an adjective/adverb what you could be saying is that this word belongs to a... [narrower phrase] and that it is the most important word in the [narrower phrase] but how it exactly narrows down is not known because the entire [narrower phrase] is not known...
"baby powder" could mean: "powder that is used for babies (even this is probably not exact).
"the flowery dress" could mean: "dress that possess images of flowers".
If the [range] words: tall, short, wide and slim equal measurements and measurements are of something then the correct way to say: "x1 is tall" is: "x1 tall". I do not need to say: "x1 measurement equal tall" because we know "tall" is a "measurement" word, as we know "red" is a "colour". I think this is how it works: if a word belongs to one category of words (no matter how... [tiered]) one does not need to identify that category of word in a conveyance.
Getting up early every day at around 06:00 is not my idea of fun, gettin' up nearly every day at around 08:00 and not really have too, is.
"This is mine" = This YS (AB equal possession of I)
Things which require effort and which are needed and not desired should be as simple as possible so that the effort required is not so great that it drains the energy of the exerter, causing the exerter to not be able to exert energy in their desires.
A language, or at least a vocabulary builder, method (that might already be known): present the illustrated concept [three] times. Each time it is presented with its word everything besides the concept is different. If the concept is a chair then in each presentation make the chair a different colour, size, material, [everything] (as much as possible). Since the same word is being used in each presentation I think the mind is going to naturally associate it with one concept and so seek out the concept that is the same in each illustration.
The fear of being perceived as what I'm not pressures me to be... what I'm not. To want what I don't want. I see myself better now though, so I have control of myself better now.
~Shawn Savoie~
~Ottawa, Ontario, Canada~
The simplest braille type script to create, I would think, would be to just [embosse] a particular language's existing graphemes. Like I think the simplest type of sign language is to draw in the air or on the receiver a particular language's existing graphemes.
If I gotta work then I gotta work. If I don't gotta work... I ain't gonna. If one thinks that this is bad and that I'm lazy and that I should just suck it up and do it (WHEN I DON'T HAVE TO) then I don't care what one thinks.
If x1's in time of past and in time of beginning of,... xor ending of [event] then the event must also be in the past. If we conceive of front time of beginning of and behind time of ending of [event] as... mere [milliseconds] front and behind then x1's time is also the time of the event. If you don't have this conception (rule) then I think you'd run into the same problem I ran into. An example being: "x1 in time pf present and behind time of ending of [event]". I was like... if I'm in the present then the event has to be in the past. Technically it still is, I think, so my front and behind are right, right, right front and behind. Another good thing about this is that when the time of the event has been identified if the reality is that everything in the event is the same tense you do not have to convery those tenses. It's a brevity scheme! (As you can read, I'm excited. I thought I was screwed there for a little while).
I think the [to bes] (am, are, is, was, were, will be) are tense indicators (an aspect indicator as well) only sometimes and as well an equal at other times.
Example of the former: Shawn is hungry = Shawn [in time of present and in time of middle of] (Shawn desire equal (Shawn eat)).
Example of the latter: The door is closed = The door [in time of present and in time of middle of] (the door equal close[direct object of host word]) (I have to work on the definition of this suffix more but it should suffice for now.)
Nelly Furtado makes me hot, oh (::shrugs:: lol.) but sadly I don't mean anything to her :( (Don't those bangs make you wanna bang? :D)
Here's what a vocative might be: FA = [I YS ( AB desire equal (I attention of x1))] ("YS" equals "in time of present and in time of middle of". "AB" equal roughly "possesser of the tense and aspect word". It's a pronoun because the possesser of the tense and aspect word could be very long, perhaps multiple subject heads with long tails.)
When learning a second language you must take a descriptionist type approach and just learn how it works and use it how it's used.
Adjectives and adverbs may be a brevity scheme. The adjective/adverb may be a word at the end of a phrase that narrows down another word. If you take the end word and inflect it to indicate that it's an adjective/adverb what you could be saying is that this word belongs to a... [narrower phrase] and that it is the most important word in the [narrower phrase] but how it exactly narrows down is not known because the entire [narrower phrase] is not known...
"baby powder" could mean: "powder that is used for babies (even this is probably not exact).
"the flowery dress" could mean: "dress that possess images of flowers".
If the [range] words: tall, short, wide and slim equal measurements and measurements are of something then the correct way to say: "x1 is tall" is: "x1 tall". I do not need to say: "x1 measurement equal tall" because we know "tall" is a "measurement" word, as we know "red" is a "colour". I think this is how it works: if a word belongs to one category of words (no matter how... [tiered]) one does not need to identify that category of word in a conveyance.
Getting up early every day at around 06:00 is not my idea of fun, gettin' up nearly every day at around 08:00 and not really have too, is.
"This is mine" = This YS (AB equal possession of I)
Things which require effort and which are needed and not desired should be as simple as possible so that the effort required is not so great that it drains the energy of the exerter, causing the exerter to not be able to exert energy in their desires.
A language, or at least a vocabulary builder, method (that might already be known): present the illustrated concept [three] times. Each time it is presented with its word everything besides the concept is different. If the concept is a chair then in each presentation make the chair a different colour, size, material, [everything] (as much as possible). Since the same word is being used in each presentation I think the mind is going to naturally associate it with one concept and so seek out the concept that is the same in each illustration.
The fear of being perceived as what I'm not pressures me to be... what I'm not. To want what I don't want. I see myself better now though, so I have control of myself better now.
~Shawn Savoie~
~Ottawa, Ontario, Canada~